{"id":421,"date":"2008-05-10T21:59:55","date_gmt":"2008-05-10T21:59:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/tromey.com\/blog\/?p=421"},"modified":"2008-05-10T21:59:55","modified_gmt":"2008-05-10T21:59:55","slug":"would-you-do-it-again-for-free","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tromey.com\/blog\/?p=421","title":{"rendered":"Would you do it again for free?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Thursday night I finally made it to a <a href=\"http:\/\/lug.boulder.co.us\/\">BLUG<\/a> meeting.  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.openlogic.com\/blogs\/author\/stormy\/\">Stormy Peters<\/a> from OpenLogic gave a talk titled &#8220;Would you do it again for free?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Her talk covered some familiar ground &#8212; intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation, a list of motivations that free software developers claim (or that are claimed by others), the various methods of payment.  Her slides were beautiful; she seemed a bit nervous though not overly so.<\/p>\n<p>She also talked a bit about inequality in projects.  She claimed that 40% of developers on free software projects are paid to do so; a show-of-hands at the meeting showed similar results.<\/p>\n<p>OpenLogic is running the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.osscensus.org\/\">Open Source Census<\/a> &#8212; kind of a cross-platform popcon.  If you read her blog a bit you&#8217;ll see that she uses this information when talking to VCs and the like.  That&#8217;s a smart idea and I&#8217;m generally in favor of hard data over speculation anyhow.<\/p>\n<p>She was using an Asus, kinda cool.  And Neil, sitting next to me, was using an XO.  Weird times we live in.<\/p>\n<p>Motivation, of course, is a psychological phenomenon, one with which we all have direct experience.  That is, everybody has an opinion&#8230; so one commenter from the audience rejected most of her list of motivations in favor of &#8212; you guessed it &#8212; his.  I suppose this is the bikeshed effect in a different form.<\/p>\n<p>I didn&#8217;t agree with everything in Stormy&#8217;s talk.  At one point she gave a sort of economic history of mankind which, I think, was badly mistaken on the facts, though perhaps not our experience of them.<\/p>\n<p>After the talk I asked her about the pretty photos and consistent palette in her presentation.  She said they were CC-licensed works from flickr and from some stock photo site&#8230; nice.  (Also I noticed her slowly backing away while we talked.  Whoa!  Like, I&#8217;ve always been afraid of being that person. And now &#8230; hard data.  Crap.)<\/p>\n<p>She also talked a bit about the relationship developers have with open source.  One idea was that a hacker might leave a project (suppose the project dies) &#8212; but will just switch projects and keep working.  Also, supposedly nowadays open source developers make more money than proprietary developers; but, conversely, often claim that they would take a pay cut to work on open source (the intrinsic motivation thing).  Let&#8217;s hope our bosses stop midway through that sentence.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m fascinated by the social dimension of programming.  Partly this is defensive; over the years I&#8217;ve developed some heuristics that I use to evaluate developers (sorry.  But it is true.  And of course I like you.) and projects, mostly to try to keep away from painful experiences.  But, I&#8217;m also interested in a more general taxonomy of projects &#8212; my suspicion is that many of the things we think we know about running projects either aren&#8217;t so, or are &#8220;don&#8217;t care&#8221; boxes in the Karnaugh map of administration.  What is cool is that the free software movement is so big, now, that we have an excellent laboratory in which to study.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Thursday night I finally made it to a BLUG meeting. Stormy Peters from OpenLogic gave a talk titled &#8220;Would you do it again for free?&#8221; Her talk covered some familiar ground &#8212; intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation, a list of motivations that free software developers claim (or that are claimed by others), the various methods of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,8,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-421","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-boulder","category-personal","category-software"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tromey.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/421","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tromey.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tromey.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tromey.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tromey.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=421"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tromey.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/421\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tromey.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=421"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tromey.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=421"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tromey.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=421"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}